Accueil Forum de discussion Nous rejoindre
 Désistement Confidentialité English
Profile  |  Immigration au Canada  |  Visa au Canada  |  Emplois au Canada  |  Immigration au USA  |  Immigration en Australie  |  
Formulaire d’évaluation gratuite

(Cliquer ici)
QUESTIONS sur le logement, le travail, les études ou la vie au Canada? Cliquez ici maintenant pour fixer un rendez-vous pour une consultation téléphonique personnelle
Cherchez vous un emplois au Canada?
Navigation sur le Site Immigration
Fonctions additionnelles du site
Home >> permanent residence
Case Profile


DISCLAIMER:

The following has been prepared by Colin R. Singer, Attorney At Law, for the intended reference by interested individuals and is not intended to create an attorney-client communication. This writing may be reproduced for the personal non commercial use of interested individuals on the express or implied condition that the contents herein are neither edited, modified nor altered in whole or in part, directly or indirectly without the express written consent of the author herein. (Canadian Immigration and Employment Law)


Citizenship: Banerjee, Re 25 Imm.L.R. (2d) 239 (Fed.T.D.). Whether physical presence in Canada is required to maintain residence requirements under the Citizenship Act.

The applicant obtained landed status on 19 February 1989. He arrived with his two daughters. His wife arrived in May. His mother arrived at a later date. Following the arrival of the family, they lived initially with his paternal uncle and thereafter in their own premises on the Montreal West Island. The applicant secured insurance numbers, medical care cards, obtained a Quebec driver's license and established contact with the Board of Trade. In the course of the next three years, the applicant was absent from Canada 866 days, where he earned his livelihood as an international business consultant in the field of chemicals. As such he traveled extensively in Europe, the Middle East and Far East. His clients and his market are overseas. He owned no other real property elsewhere.

In overruling the Citizenship Judge, the Federal Court of Appeal concluded that applicant had effectively established residence prior to departing; the quality of attachment to Canada was determinative and that Canada was not being used by applicant as a facility of convenience. This decision supports a liberal application of the residence requirements under the Citizenship Act.

Codage, format et droit d’auteur sur le contenu du site CCIRC 1994-2012.
Le Centre de Ressources d’immigration et de citoyenneté canadienne.