Several of the world’s leading countries could copy Canada’s private refugee sponsorship program following its success in bringing in thousands of Syrian refugees.
Nearly 14,000 Syrians were privately sponsored between November 4, 2015 and December 19, 2016, as Canadians responded to a growing crisis caused by a bitter civil war in the Middle Eastern country.
Officials from Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Britain, Chile, Germany, New Zealand, and the U.S. attended a conference in Ottawa in December aimed at learning how the model works, and how it could be applied in their countries.
Private sponsorship has been used here since the 1970s, but shot to prominence as Canadians lined up to help Syrians over the last year.
Canada’s attitude to welcoming Syrians was lauded around the world in late 2015 and throughout 2016, as the federal government made good on an election promise to bring in 25,000 refugees by last February.
Syrian Refugees Arrived in Canada Since December 10, 2015
|Blended Visa Office-Referred||3,877|
Source: Government of Canada
The overall figure now sits at 38,713 as the process continues, albeit at a slower pace.
As other countries, including Britain and the U.S., have been gripped by support for anti-immigration, protectionist policies, Canada has become a beacon for exactly the opposite attitude under Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.
However, the process of welcoming and integrating such a wave of refugees has not been without its problems and challenges.
The government recently announced it will limit the number of private sponsorship refugee applications it receives for Syrians and Iraqis to 1,000 in 2017, as it looks to clear the backlog already in the system.
The limit will apply to both Groups of Five and Community Sponsors, according to a new public policy from Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC).
The move comes following complaints from private sponsors with applications already in the system and families ready to move, that they have been left waiting for months and years for the paperwork to be processed.
Once the backlog is cleared, the target processing time will be 12 months.
While the move will mean less new applications are received in 2017, IRCC hopes it will mean the paperwork will be processed more quickly.
As the anniversary of the arrival of the first Syrians to Canada went by in December 2016, the early newcomers without jobs began claiming via provincial social benefits channels instead of refugee-specific funds.
The reality is setting in concerning the difficulties of integrating into a new life and, most importantly, entering the workforce.
“Those of us who were at the airport that day with Prime Minister Trudeau will never forget the moving experience of welcoming Syrian newcomers with warm hearts and winter coats,” said Immigration Minister John McCallum on the day of the anniversary.
“Millions of Canadians were equally moved as they followed media coverage of the event, and over the past year, they have enthusiastically greeted the arrival of resettled Syrian refugees in communities from coast to coast to coast.
“Canadians from all walks of life joined in what was truly a national project to resettle Syrian refugees. Every effort, big and small, from volunteers, service providers, sponsors, corporate Canada and so many others, combined to make an enormous difference.”
The government admitted in October that the number of Syrian refugee children arriving in the last year came as a surprise.
McCallum said the large number of children ‘was not completely anticipated’, with schools especially struggling to cope with the influx of new students.
Teachers in New Brunswick were overwhelmed by the sudden influx of Syrian refugee students in early 2016, leading to chaos in some classrooms, according to a report.
Schools were not prepared for new students who hadn’t been educated regularly for years, did not speak English and came from war-torn areas of the Middle East.
The result was a whirlwind of poor behaviour, bullying and problems surrounding gender roles as teachers were left to deal with a difficult adjustment phase often without the help of translators.
School staff said they had no idea how many students would be arriving meaning preparation was impossible and all teachers could do was react to the situation as it developed.
Extra funding to hire more staff eventually alleviated the problem.
The plight of Canada’s temporary foreign workers and the businesses that employ them has been a regular agenda item of the federal government throughout 2016.
The Temporary Foreign Worker Program inherited by the Liberals from the Conservatives appeared to frustrate everyone – from workers, to employers and human rights campaigners.
Throughout the year, Immigration Minister John McCallum and his team at Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada have been assessing what changes were needed to make the program more suited for its purpose.
The aim was to achieve the difficult balancing act of fulfilling the needs of businesses while not giving away jobs to foreign workers brought in from abroad that Canadians could be hired to fill.
Did You Know?
Both Immigration Minister John McCallum and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau have used the TFWP in their personal lives, the former to hire a caregiver from the Philippines for his 92-year-old mother, and the latter to bring in two nannies for his children.
A Standing Committee report into the TFWP, delivered in September after a series of hearings in which all stakeholders were allowed their say, made 21 recommendations for improvements that should be made.
The government’s main point of action has been to abolish the four-in, four-out rule that limited the total amount of time workers could remain in Canada under the TFWP. More changes are expected in 2017.
In this report, immigration.ca looks back on a year of evaluation of the TFWP affecting temporary workers in Canada.
Early 2016: Frustrations With TFWP
A key challenge of the TFWP is maintaining workers’ rights while delivering a program intended to bring them to Canada temporarily, and at the same time ensuring no Canadians are losing out on employment opportunities.
One of the main issues with the program is the power this gives employers over employees, especially those on employer-specific contracts. There have been many reports of temporary workers reluctant to raise complaints against an employer because of that power.
Reports have included workers working seven days a week without overtime, or being housed in poorly maintained accommodation. Avenues to complain exist, but go unused with workers fearing they will lose their jobs and be sent back to their home countries.
Elsewhere, backlogs with provincial nominee programs, particularly Alberta, saw temporary workers reach the four-year time limit before applications for permanent residence were processed, forcing them to return to their home countries or become illegal.
High-profile cases of abuse of the TFWP saw the Conservatives impose some strict limitations on use of the program in sweeping 2014 reforms. The reforms created the International Mobility Program and raised the cost of a Labour Market Impact Assessment (LMIA) – the process of assessing whether a Canadian is available to do a job – from $250 to $1,000. Further changes saw caps put in place designed to eventually reduce the number of foreign workers to 10 per cent of a company’s workforce. The Conservative changes saw the numbers of temporary workers in Canada dramatically reduced, from almost 120,000 in 2013 to under 75,000 in 2015.
As a result of the changes, and particularly the caps, businesses including meat processors in Alberta and fish cleaning plants in the maritime provinces could no longer operate at full capacity – no Canadians wanted the jobs and caps meant they could not bring in workers using the TFWP.
Mid-2016: Federal Government Relaxes Caps
The Liberals relaxed the planned 10 per cent cap ahead of July 1, 2016, when it was due to be imposed. The government recognized employers were already struggling to fill positions with the cap at 20 per cent, and decided not to reduce it further. In reality, the relaxation of the cap came too late for many businesses who had already made the necessary adjustments in anticipation of the caps being imposed. Many were left back at the start of the hiring process after laying off foreign workers.
Summer 2016: Standing Committee Review
Throughout the summer, a government Standing Committee conducted a review of the TFWP and how it could be changed to solve some of the problems experienced by workers and employers. The committee heard from a number of stakeholders in conducting the review, although it also faced criticism for not being thorough enough on what is a crucial program for Canada’s economy. One of the key aspects of the review was whether temporary workers should be given a pathway to permanent residence, an issue that polarized opinion.
September 2016: Standing Committee Recommendations
The committee found it difficult to attain balance in its recommendations for TFWP. It stopped short of recommending a direct path to Canadian permanent residency for all temporary workers, which would have been untenable.
It did imply there was scope for more temporary workers to become permanent residents, especially those who have integrated into Canadian society and are fulfilling a labour market need. It is right to remove some of the barriers to permanent residency that exist simply because of the way the Canadian immigration system is structured.
All 21 Standing Committee recommendations are listed below. For full analysis, click here.
Extend work permits for caregivers in the low-wage stream from one to two years.
Review the LMIA application process with a view to increasing speed and efficiency, and taking into consideration the National Occupation Classification as well as the adequate allocation of resources towards training and meeting service standards.
Implement a Trusted Employer Program with the objective of reducing LMIA processing times for employers who have demonstrated trustworthiness in their use of the TFWP.
Review the policy with respect to foreign faculty members currently employed or seeking employment with a recognized Canadian academic institution, whose employment is currently dependent upon a LMIA, with a view to providing exemptions or accommodations for this class of foreign nationals.
Allow minor modifications to contracts between TFWP employers and employees with regards to the nature of the work and increases in wages if both parties consent, the changes do not disadvantage the worker, and Employment and Social Development Canada is adequately informed of any changes in short order. The changes must not violate the spirit of the job description.
Restructure the TFWP such that it achieves better overall economic and social benefit for Canadians and program participants. Re-establish the TFWP into more specific program areas and streams that adequately reflect the realities of labour market needs in Canada.
Study the impact of expanding the definition of primary agriculture as found in the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations.
Review and improve mechanisms in which migrant workers are brought into Canada to fill both temporary and permanent positions, preventing the use of the Temporary Foreign Worker Program to satisfy permanent labour needs.
Provide an exemption on the Transition Plan requirement for 5% of a business’s workforce that consists of high-wage temporary foreign workers.
Implement measures to ensure appropriate training and education resources are allocated in those fields most likely to present labour and skills shortages. Also, that appropriate apprenticeship targets be included as a requirement of the Transition Plan for employers to ensure they meet their recruitment and training obligations for Canadians.
Monitor labour market needs as to ensure skills, training, and educational output match Canada’s current and future employment needs such that reliance on foreign labour diminishes, and invest in better collection and retention of labour market information in Canada to adequately assess labour market needs.
Set the cap on the percentage of temporary foreign workers a business can employ at a minimum of 20 per cent, and further review sector and geographic considerations.
Take immediate steps to improve the collection of labour market data and review the geographic zones used for determining unemployment rates, with a view to aligning the labour market conditions of more localized economies with the requirements of the TFWP.
Take immediate steps to eliminate the requirement for an employer-specific work permit; provided that it implement appropriate measures to ensure temporary foreign labour is only utilized within the existing provisions of the LMIA process, including sector and geographic restrictions.
Provide multiple entry work visas for temporary foreign workers employed in seasonal work, with the objective of allowing these individuals greater mobility during off-seasons; that when a work visa is extended, the multiple entry visa must also be extended so workers can continue to enter and leave Canada.
- a) Review the current pathways to permanent residency for all temporary foreign workers, with a view to facilitating access to permanent residency for migrant workers who have integrated into Canadian society and are filling a permanent labour market need.
- b) Allocate adequate resources to allow for the timely processing of permanent residency applications for those migrant workers that are hired under the TFWP.
The IRCC should work with provinces, territories and other government departments to increase information sharing to create more harmonization with immigration and nominee programs to function in collaboration with one another. That these efforts aim to reduce duplication of work benefitting both the government and applicants.
Amend the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations to remove the relevant provisions with respect to the “cumulative duration” rule.
Reform the Express Entry program to allow for fixed-term employment contracts to be allocated the same number of points as permanent work contracts, where there is a strong likelihood of continued employment.
Review current monitoring and enforcement mechanisms, with the objective of addressing gaps in employer compliance and the protection of migrant workers’ rights. In addition, an effort shall be made to move away from a complaint driven model of program enforcement. The review shall take into consideration the following specific measures:
- a) Increase resource and information sharing with provinces and territories.
- b) Increase frequency of on-site inspections while temporary foreign labour is being used.
- c) Creating an accreditation system for recruiters, which requires compliance with TFWP rules and from which employers could exclusively select.
- d) Establish a dispute resolution mechanism for migrant workers when conflict with an employer arises.
- e) Ensure, through on-site inspections, that labour laws and regulations are properly enforced where migrant workers operate
- f) Guarantee that any workplace injuries that require immediate attention be granted emergency care where deemed necessary in Canada.
Establish measures to ensure incoming migrant workers and their employers are informed of their rights and responsibilities under TFWP, including dispute resolution and abuse reporting procedures, as well as information on wages, benefits, accommodations and working conditions. This information should be provided in the language of preference of the migrant worker.
December 2016: Initial Action From Federal Government
- The four-in, four-out rule was scrapped with immediate effect, as recommended by the Standing Committee. Under the rule, temporary workers who had been in Canada for four years became ineligible to work here for the next four years.
Immigration Minister John McCallum said at the time: “In many ways, the four-year rule put a great deal of uncertainty and instability on both temporary workers and employers. We had the sense that it was an unnecessary burden on applicants and employers, and also on officers who process applications. We believe this important recommendation from the committee requires rapid action.”
- A work force cap of 10 per cent was maintained for employers who began using the TFWP after June 20, 2014. For those using the program since before that date, the cap was set at 20 per cent. The Standing Committee had recommended the 20 per cent cap be imposed across the board. The exemption on the cap for seasonal industries seeking temporary foreign workers for up to 180 days during the 2017 calendar year was extended until December 31, 2017.
- Low-wage employers will be required to advertise positions to under-represented groups including young people, those with disabilities, Indigenous people and new immigrants, ensuring Canadians are not losing out on opportunities. These changes are yet to come into effect, with the government saying it will notify employers when they do.
December 2016: Changes Welcomed
Unions and employers welcomed the initial changes. The United Food and Commercial Workers Union (UFCW), plus Canada-wide businesses in a variety of sectors, said the changes would help improve worker rights and help companies get the staff they needed to operate at full capacity.
Electronic Travel Authorisation (eTA)
Canada also found time to implement the Electronic Travel Authorisation (eTA) in 2016, after extending the leniency period as travellers said they were unaware of the new rules.
All travellers from visa exempt countries are now required to get an eTA before they travel to Canada by air, including those passing through.
Importantly, the change also meant Canadians with dual citizenship would now have to use their Canadian passports to fly here, a section of the new policy that caused particular confusion.
There remains a special authorization system in place for those caught out over the holidays. For more information, click here.
Technology Sector Announcement
Following repeated feedback from the technology sector saying processing times were too long for bringing in top talent, the government has announced its plan to introduce a Global Skills Visa early in 2017.
The new plan is to allow companies that qualify to get visas and work permits approved inside two weeks as standard. Under the current system, the minimum processing time is six months.
Planned changes will also see the creation of a 30-day work permit that can be spread across a year, meaning companies can bring in workers for short stints without the need to apply for new paperwork each time.
The visa may not only apply to the technology sector, with a recent indication it could also include target businesses that are granted access by the federal government. This is one area to look out for in 2017.
In the latest immigration.ca livestream discussion, Canadian Immigration Lawyer and Managing Partner Colin Singer analyzes the recent changes made to family reunification immigration in Canada.
Here he discusses the impact of the federal government’s commitment to reduce processing times to 12 months in the majority of cases.
Canada Immigration Lawyer and immigration.ca Managing Partner Colin Singer discusses changes to how Comprehensive Ranking System points are scored under the Express Entry System in a new livestream.
Colin also covers how you can boost your score in light of the new changes, and focuses on why the government decided to reduce points for a qualified job offer and introduce points for Canadian education.
Americans looking to flee a Donald Trump presidency are the focus of the latest immigration.ca livestream, which comes following the U.S. poll that sent shockwaves around the world.
Following the November 9 vote, the Canadian government immigration website crashed under the volume of traffic from Americans looking to move north. Here, Canadian Immigration Lawyer and Managing Partner Colin Singer discusses how they can achieve that move.
Canada Immigration Lawyer and Managing Partner Colin Singer is back with immigration.ca’s latest livestream discussion on new developments in the world of Canadian immigration.
A key focus of this livestream is the record number of immigrants welcomed to Canada in the year to July 2016, at 320,000, driven by Syrian refugees.
Join Canadian Immigration Lawyer and Managing Partner Colin Singer for the latest immigration.ca livestream, which focuses on how to boost your Comprehensive Ranking System score once you are in the Express Entry pool.
If you have been in the pool for a few months but are yet to get that coveted Invitation to Apply, this is the livestream you need to watch.
The build up to the release of the Canadian government’s immigration numbers plan is the focus of the second immigration.ca livestream with Canada Immigration Lawyer and Managing Partner Colin Singer.
The discussion focuses on a shortage of skilled workers in Canada and how Immigration Minister John McCallum plans to do something about it.
Immigration.ca’s first livestream sees Canadian Immigration Lawyer and Managing Partner Colin Singer bring you up to date with the latest developments in the world of immigration in Canada.
Canada Immigration Lawyer Colin also fields questions at the end of the discussion, with these videos set to become a regular offering from our team at immigration.ca.
An increase in the number of terror attacks around the world is having an unavoidable influence on the attitude of Canadians, according to an expert from a leading survey provider.
Tony Coulson from Environics Research says that while Canadian society continues to ‘evolve toward a more open and flexible outlook’ in the long term, a recent increase in terrorist activity is ‘strengthening the will of those who believe that people coming to Canada from elsewhere are more likely to bring trouble than valuable energy and ideas’.
Coulson, in an article for the Globe and Mail, highlights that two thirds of Canadians remain open to immigration. But he believes attitudes among the remaining third are hardening due to world events.
“Although Canada’s long-term values trajectory is toward this latter worldview defined by adaptability, questioning of authority, and openness to difference, our most recent survey reveals a modest stalling of this evolution,” Coulson writes.
“Perhaps this change is a function of many people’s sense that the world is becoming a scarier place. Regardless, as Canadians and their leaders debate policy in the years ahead, it is useful to remember the values landscape that underlies our reactions to the latest headlines.”
The latest Environics survey suggests the following:
- Majority of Canadians expect a terror attack here in the next two years.
- A third say they will change their daily routines by reducing trips to public places or changing where and when they travel.
- More than half believe bringing individuals responsible for attacks to justice is sufficient punishment, where as four in 10 support war against terrorists.
- A quarter are happy for police to snoop on phone calls and texts without a specific warrant.
- Two thirds of Canadians are open to immigration and express less acceptance of police ‘snooping’.
- Immigration from certain regions should be slowed, according to four in 10, and a quarter say it should be eliminated entirely.
Coulson sees two different sets of values emerging between those who want to limit immigration and those are open to it.
Key consistent values in the limit immigration group are acceptance of police snooping, and support for going to war to end terror. They also score highly on traditional values regarding family, gender and patriarchy, Coulson writes. Above average scores on xenophobia and cultural assimilation are also common.
Among the two thirds of Canadians who are open to immigration, there is less acceptance of police snooping and more support for individual justice. “These Canadians hold values such as adaptability to complexity, global consciousness, multiculturalism, and social learning (the belief that people benefit from interacting with diverse others),” Coulson writes.
It is important to consider that when the federal government is shaping immigration policy, it needs to find a balance that pleases both groups.
By keeping the number of new immigrants at 300,000 for 2017, the same as 2016, the federal government is establishing a benchmark level for the coming years.
It could not jump in and significantly increase the number of newcomers without upsetting a large proportion of the electorate. Instead, it will add numbers, but in a strategic and measured way.
It is important to note that while the upper target for 2016 immigration is 305,000, the government is expected to exceed that figure after welcoming 320,000 newcomers in the year-end to July.
The upper target for 2017 is 320,000 but if 2016 is anything to go by, the government views these figures as guidance rather than imposing any strict limit.
Numbers will rise significantly in the come years, but the government knows the increase has to be carefully managed to appease all stakeholders.