August 10, 2017 – Canada’s reputation as a welcoming country for immigrants and refugees cannot be extended to asylum seekers, according to an academic in the field.
Vic Satzewich, professor of sociology at McMaster University, says little has changed between how Canada treats asylum seekers under the current and former federal governments.
Writing in the Globe and Mail, Satzewich said: “The sad reality is that Canada’s welcoming approach to immigrants and refugees comes at the expense of asylum seekers.”
The article comes at a time when asylum seekers are pouring across the border at a rate of 150 per day from New York to Quebec. However the article fails to undertake any comparison to other areas in the world where western countries are dealing with a far great influx of asylum seekers.
For comparison purposes, Italy with a population of 60 million, is currently receiving more than 12,000 asylum seekers per month, mainly
from North Africa. The problem is so great in that country, that Italian authorities are threatening to invoke war time measures that would entail
it passing legislation to hand out hundreds of thousands of temporary EU visas to asylum seekers which would allow the migrants to legally
travel north using a Brussels directive.
The situation is such that Montreal’s Olympic stadium had to be converted into a temporary home for claimants, who are believed to be mainly Haitians fearing for their status in the U.S. under Donald Trump.
Despite rhetoric from Prime Minister Justin Trudeau saying Canada remains open as Trump cracks down, Satzewich says that openness is only for a certain category of newcomer.
He points out that Trudeau spoke about maintaining the integrity of Canada’s immigration system and Immigration Minister Ahmed Hussen advised Haitians to stay in the U.S. and make their claim through the correct channels.
“Canada’s approach to asylum seekers pokes holes in the image of the country as inherently welcoming to immigrants and refugees,” Satzewich writes.
He added: “Maintaining the “integrity of the immigration system” is in part the shared code language for how our governments (Conservative or Liberal) think about asylum seekers.
“Canada may love refugees like Syrians who are selected and screened abroad before they set foot in the country, but the same cannot be said about asylum seekers who wash up on our shores in boats, or who walk across our border with the U.S.”
As Satzewich points out, Canada finds itself in a delicate position when dealing with matters related to Trump’s America.
There have been several calls for Canada to suspend the Safe Third Country Agreement with the U.S., which says an asylum seeker must make their claim in the first country to which they arrive. The agreement is the reason why those coming from the U.S. are having to cross the border at remote locations, with the aim of getting arrested and entering the Canadian immigration system.
However, with negotiations currently ongoing for the renegotiation of NAFTA, Canada will not want to do anything to harm its position. “I also doubt whether the Liberals are going to want to muddy the waters as we renegotiate NAFTA,” Satzewich writes.
Meanwhile, if Trudeau decide to do the opposite and stop asylum seekers crossing the border in the first place, the message this would send and pictures it would generate – of Canadian officers turning families away – would not be good for public relations.
It leaves Canada stuck in a kind of limbo, as the flow of asylum seekers gradually increases.
Interested employers: Kindly contact us here to receive further information.
Interested candidates: Find out whether you qualify to Canada by completing our free on-line evaluation. We will provide you with our evaluation within 1-2 business days.
Read more news about Canada Immigration by clicking here.