Aug 23, 2019 – What is the implication when a province issues an approval for a newcomer to relocate to its province and what are the obligations of an applicant to actually settle in that province?
The right to legislate in the field of immigration in Canada is shared equally between the federal government and the provinces, apart from Quebec.
The Quebec government acquired exclusive rights to establish its own policies and programs in 1981.
However, all of the provinces and territories have implemented their own programs to select immigrants.
What Does Canadian Charter Say about Mobility of Permanent Residents?
Section 6 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms provides permanent residents and Canadian citizens with the right to live and work in any province in Canada.
What Does Section 6 Say on Mobility?
(1) Every citizen of Canada has the right to enter, remain in and leave Canada.
(2) Every citizen of Canada and every person who has the status of a permanent resident of Canada has the right:
- to move to and take up residence in any province; and
- to pursue the gaining of a livelihood in any province.
How Do Mobility Rights Apply to Immigration?
In immigration matters, the implication of section 6 and mobility rights under the Charter is significant. But these rights do not actually begin until permanent residence has been established.
Once a province selects an applicant, the federal Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) will oversee admissibility issues, including health and security.
Upon landing at a Port of Entry (POE) in Canada, the Canada Border Services Agency will also ensure admissibility, including verifying the truthfulness of an applicant’s intentions to reside in a particular province.
Paragraph 87(2)(b) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations (IRPR) clarifies that a foreign national is a member of the PNP class if they intend to reside in the province that has nominated them.
After receiving permanent residence and appearing at a POE for admission to Canada, once admitted, there is nothing that can come in between an applicant’s Charter mobility rights to live and work anywhere in Canada.
The provinces which seek to attract newcomers under their PNPs are left to create the right conditions to attract, and more importantly, retain, immigrants.
How Are Provinces Used as A Back Door to Canada?
This has been an ongoing challenge for some of the provinces that are being used by applicants, who do not otherwise qualify for admission under the Federal Skilled Worker Program, as a “back door entry” to Canada.
Indeed, this has been a serious challenge facing Quebec which has direct authority to select economic immigrants representing approximately 20 per cent of total admissions to Canada. This is by far the most of any province.
Historically, and as empirical data confirms, the province of Quebec retains only a fraction of the business investor applicants it actually approves.
Many applicants often decide to forego their initial intention to settle in Quebec and elect to settle elsewhere.
This is especially the case under the Quebec Immigrant Investor Program (QIIP) which has dominated the Canadian market of investment-based immigration.
For other provinces including Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Nova Scotia and Prince Edward Island which promote their own skilled worker programs, the retention of immigrants remains an ongoing challenge for provincial policy makers.
Why Candidates Must Show Intent to Settle in a Province
- Applicants applying through a PNP or Quebec must maintain compliance with the program and truthfulness in the application process. The intention to settle in a province under an immigration program must be clearly present upon landing.
- In the case of individuals where indications at the POE are that they no longer intend to reside in the nominating province/territory, they may be reported under section A44(1) for non-compliance with paragraph 87(2)(b) of the IRPR.
- At worst, where it becomes evident that an individual never intended to reside in the nominating province or territory, this could give rise to an allegation of misrepresentation, pursuant to paragraph 40(1)(a) of the IRPA.
- Immigration practitioners including lawyers and consultants must be especially carefully when counselling their clients on meeting settlement intentions, under the Act. This is especially important given the rules on counselling misrepresentation under section 126 of the Immigration Act.
Why New Canadians Face a Careful Balancing Act
Canada’s 730-day residence rules are among the world’s most flexible. Applicant’s can theoretically leave Canada soon after becoming permanent residents for a period of up to 3 years while retaining their Canadian permanent residence during an initially long period of absence.
A Canadian permanent resident is thus afforded the protection under section 6 of the Charter, to change their minds about where they want to live and work in Canada.
There are no obstacles or formalities for Canadians to change their province of residence once permanent residence has been firmly established. Government immigration officials at the federal and provincial levels are well aware of this dilemma.
Provincial immigration programs are increasingly becoming attractive entry points for newcomers to Canada. The provinces also face increasing challenges to correctly choose and retain immigrants.
Applicants considering an immigration project to Canada under provincial programs must do so while carefully balancing their legal rights afforded by section 6 of the Charter and the legal obligations imposed under the Immigration Act.
Interested employers: Kindly contact us here to receive further information.
Interested candidates: Find out whether you qualify to Canada by completing our free on-line evaluation. We will provide you with our evaluation within 1-2 business days.
Read more news about Canada Immigration by clicking here.